| Health indicators | Rank |
| Population | 916,265 |
| Number of insurance mandates | 39 |
| Death rate per 100,000 | 778.8 |
| Percent of adults overweight or obese | 54.70% |
| Percent of adults who have visited a dentist in the last 12 months | 65.90% |
| Number of births (2004) | 11,519 |
| Ranking public policy | Rank |
| Overall health ownership rank | 6 |
| Government health care rank | 10 |
| Private health insurance rank | 21 |
| Medical tort rank | 35 |
| Provider burden of regulation rank | 3 |
Monday, April 28, 2008Trapping Kids in Government ProgramsBy John LaPlanteCategories: Montana, SCHIPAccording to the Bozeman Daily Chronicle, more children in Montana may soon be herded into a government program. "State Auditor and Insurance Commissioner John Morrison," the paper says, "is leading efforts to make more Montana kids eligible for a federal heath-insurance program." Morrison isn't just getting is employees to step-up efforts to enroll children who are currently eligible but not participating. He's also leading the effort to expand the Montana Medicaid program through a ballot measure, Initiative 155. (The Montana Standard has more.) Anyone see a conflict of interest here?
|
Monday, January 14, 2008Montana Looking at SCHIP ExpansionVoters to decide on SCHIP & Medicaid ballot measure By Marc KilmerCategories: Medicaid, Montana, SCHIPMontana's state auditor is pushing a ballot initiative to expand the state's children's health insurance program to cover children in families up to 250% of the federal poverty level (FPL) and increase Medicaid eligibility up to 185% of FPL. The proposal would have originally mandated that all children in the state have health insurance, but it was rewritten to remove this mandate. An interesting addition to the measure is a proposal that would allow the state to pay for private health insurance for children who are eligible for Medicaid or SCHIP but whose parents have private health coverage. If the premium increase for adding the child is less than the cost of covering the child with government insurance, the state would pay for the private coverage. That sounds like a better way of covering people than merely expanding government programs, but I wonder how much crowd-out will occur.
|