| Population | 3,482,934 |
| Number of insurance mandates | 50 |
| Death rate per 100,000 | 705.6 |
Percent of adults overweight or obese | 55.20% |
Percent of adults who have visited a dentist in the last 12 months | 80.60% |
| Number of births (2004) | 42,095 |
| Health ownership rank | 42 |
| Government health care rank | 16 |
| Private health insurance rank | 38 |
| Medical tort rank | 44 |
| Provider burden of regulation rank | 39 |
Sources
Friday, April 25, 2008Heading to a Disaster in ConnecticutBy John LaPlanteCategories: ConnecticutAfter I wrote a blog entry about a proposal in the Connecticut House to herd small business owners into health insurance plans for state employees, Linda Gorman (see the comments in the link above) noted a similarity to "Kentucky Kare," whose chief result might be summed up in the words "disaster ensued." It looks like Connecticut is moving a step closer to disaster, with the House yesterday passing the proposal. (The headline in the Hartford Courant is warm and cuddly: "Connecticut House passes bill opening insurance to more people.") Put aside the question of whether having insurance is as important as actually getting care when you need it (it isn't), is this a good idea? One problem is that it could lead to higher expenses for state taxpayers when companies bidding on the right to supply state workers with coverage recalculate their bids. Eric J. George of the Connecticut Business and Industry Association identified an even more serious problem when he said "This is really the first step to single-payer," with all that implies for consumer (dis)satisfaction.
|
Thursday, April 24, 2008We're all State Employees NowBy John LaPlanteCategories: ConnecticutThe Connecticut Legislature is debating an unusual way of helping small businesses obtain health insurance--make them state employees. Actually, the proposal by Rep. Chris Donovan isn't to put small business employees on the payroll, but to let them buy into the health insurance plan of state employees. Local government employees would get that option, too. Advocates of the idea claim that by expanding the number of people in the pool, it will lower costs. The companies that cover state workers aren't convinced, saying they reserve the right to recalculate rates upward should the idea pass. This idea has some merit if you look at it very casually. But it also puts the state in the position of determining what a "proper" insurance policy looks like, even more so than is the case when it regulates what happens in the private market. When that fact is combined with the dynamics of the political process, problems loom, including yet another step towards politicizing all of life.
|
Monday, January 22, 2007Connecticut Plan is Solution in Search of Problem"Charter Oak" Health Plan Inferior to Alternatives By John LaPlanteCategories: ConnecticutM. Jodi Rell, governor of Connecticut, says that the "Charter Oak Health Plan" would come at "no cost to the state." But D. Dowd Muska of the Yankee Institute is skeptical, especially about claims that the ranks of the uninsured represent a failure of capitalism and markets. "There is no true marketplace for health insurance," he writes. A large portion of the state's budget (30 percent) is taken up with healthcare expenses, the state imposes stringent restrictions on insurance that is sold, and a large chunk of total health spending is done through government. Further, notes Muska, the proportion of the Connecticut residents without insurance is about half that of the national rate. While Governor Rell calls for a stripped-down insurance plan, anything created or fostered through public officials will be subjected to lobbying that will soon lard up the plan with enough costs to make it out of the reach of those it is intended to help.
|